<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q-Review:  MindNode is the DJ; I&#039;m the mindmapper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.javenackerman.com/2008/12/q-review-mindnode-is-the-dj-im-the-mindmapper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.javenackerman.com/2008/12/q-review-mindnode-is-the-dj-im-the-mindmapper/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:52:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: javen</title>
		<link>http://www.javenackerman.com/2008/12/q-review-mindnode-is-the-dj-im-the-mindmapper/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>javen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-burger.com/2008/12/18/q-review-mindnode-is-the-dj-im-the-mindmapper/#comment-434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Jane&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, I was referring to NovaMind 3.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I did look at NM4, and I agree, they have improved the interface quite a bit.  However, it&#039;s still very complex, and they want $60 or more for an upgrade to the version I&#039;d want, and I didn&#039;t like it enough to spend that kind of money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But you&#039;re right.  They have greatly improved the interface since v.3.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jane</p>
<p>Yes, I was referring to NovaMind 3.  </p>
<p>I did look at NM4, and I agree, they have improved the interface quite a bit.  However, it&#8217;s still very complex, and they want $60 or more for an upgrade to the version I&#8217;d want, and I didn&#8217;t like it enough to spend that kind of money.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right.  They have greatly improved the interface since v.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.javenackerman.com/2008/12/q-review-mindnode-is-the-dj-im-the-mindmapper/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-burger.com/2008/12/18/q-review-mindnode-is-the-dj-im-the-mindmapper/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comparison. I have had NovaMind for a while too, and I absolutely love what they have done with the user interface in NovaMind 4. It seemed that in NovaMind 3 they tried to be all things to everyone but in NovaMind 4, they made it like MS Office with the ribbon bar on Windows, and like the iLife apps with drag off palettes on the Mac (with an interesting twist - flipping the palettes to see the advanced options). Very nice. I suspect your comments must be referring to an old version - suggest you check out the latest one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparison. I have had NovaMind for a while too, and I absolutely love what they have done with the user interface in NovaMind 4. It seemed that in NovaMind 3 they tried to be all things to everyone but in NovaMind 4, they made it like MS Office with the ribbon bar on Windows, and like the iLife apps with drag off palettes on the Mac (with an interesting twist &#8211; flipping the palettes to see the advanced options). Very nice. I suspect your comments must be referring to an old version &#8211; suggest you check out the latest one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
